Why People Buy Unneeded Things Essay - 905 Words

Consumer society Nowadays, there is always a reason to go shopping. But if there is something that can motivate us â€Å"to go shopping† are the Valentines days, the Christmas days, black Friday, July 4, television channels, social media, outlets, discount center, etc. All those strategies which catch our attention from the fundamental or basics needs. After all, people have a basement with a lot of stuff useless and a closet full of clothes and with nothing to wear (attention to girls). So why people buy unneeded things, is it caused they are compulsing buyers or is it because the marketing and promotions drive them to keep buying unnecesary things? In order to better understanding what is going to develop, according to Wikipedia it will define the following terms: Consumption: is a major concept in economics and is also studied by many other social sciences. Economists are particularly interested in the relationship between consumption and income, and therefore in economics the consumption function plays a major role .Consumerism: as a social and economic order and ideology encourages the acquisition of goods and services in ever-increasing amounts. Basic needs: refers to those fundamental requirements that serve as the foundation for survival. Knowing the difference between consumption and consumerism, it is important to understand that our expenses depends on basics needs and priorities. It should not be based on emotions or temporary feelings, the trends or theShow MoreRelatedWork Ethics Of Murica743 Words   |  3 Pagescan sometimes make the lower workforce feel useless, hated, and mis treated. So many problems are ruining the one thing people cannot live without. A job. How does any of that effect a good work environment? What is the big deal? There are many different ways a company can run, Morality is top priority in most places, others just do not care. Well, walk into a place like Best Buy. Happy employees? Now go into a place like Albertsons. You can easily tell the difference between the two. The reasonRead MoreThe U.s. Of Excess?956 Words   |  4 Pagesdescribe this country in a word I would use excessive, this country over does it in numerous ways through the use and overconsumption of food, agricultural production, and materialistic purchases. The people in this country always tend to â€Å"bite off more than they can chew†, literally. Countless people every day throw out food either because it has gone bad because they bought too much of what they did not need. They never end up eating it in the first place leaving it to go bad. â€Å"But all food goesRead MoreThe Consumption Function Of Marketing And Promotions Drive Them For Buying Unnecessary Things?875 Words   |  4 Pagescenter, etc. All those strategies which catch our attention from the fundamental or basics needs. After all, people have a basement with a lot of stuff useless and a closet full of clothes and with nothing to wear (attention to girls). So why people buy unneeded things, is it caused they are compulsive buyers or is it because the marketing and promotions drive them to keep buying unnecessary things? In order to better understanding what is going to develop, according to Wikipedia it will define theRead MoreAnimal Experimentation Is The Death1426 Words   |  6 Pagesto do this testing of products, and it cost tons of money for our country. The worst thing about animal experimentation is the death. One of the many reasons for this unneeded death is this, the ‘Scientists’ treat these animals as lab equipment, even though they are living and breathing. â€Å"Nothing more than disposable lab equipment.† (Animal Experiments: Overview.). This is pretty sad as these are living things yet they do this to them anything. Just think about if these where your pets? Or yourRead MoreShould We Bring Mobile Phones to School?836 Words   |  4 Pagestechnology wonders beleaguer the world. As the cellular technology invades our everyday lives, one rather pertinent question springs to mind, who does not own a mobile phone these days? It has become an integral part of modern man s life. The amazing thing about mobile phones is that they are no longer just used for calling or texting. They have become an indispensable multi-tool wonder. Todays’ cell phones embody cutting-edge technology that puts the world at y our fingertips. Alongside with this ubiquitousRead MoreObamaCare: The Current and Future Failure of the Affordable Care Act1340 Words   |  6 Pageseverybody and thats right thing to do, our president is quoted in saying in reference to his intangible innovation, the Affordable Care Act (â€Å"Obama Tweaks†). But is the act truly a good thing? Truthfully this act isn’t good now nor will it be in the long run. This act is supposed to make health care affordable to all American citizens, but that is not the case. President Obama promised in his 2008 campaign that his health care act will be the best thing for the American people in the long run. ThereRead MoreTheme Of Poverty In Ethan Frome965 Words   |  4 Pageswriting style of focussing on the upper class she was raised in and focuses on the troubles of the lower class. This story is about a man who tries to escape poverty ends up failing.Using the sociological critical approach one is able to hypothesize why Whar ton moved from her usual writing style and determine a theme from it. The sociological approach is when one examines the political or economic context in which the story is written. Examining the society and class the author lives or lived in alongRead MoreEssay on Zinn, Its a Wonderful Life and Fight Club1456 Words   |  6 PagesBerman’s book Why America Failed: The Roots of Imperial Decline, Frank Capra’s movie It’s a Wonderful Life and in Chuck Palahniuk’s movie Fight Club. Each of them giving us a different perspective on how they portray American‘s view on how we feel a need of materialistic items in our lives. Each piece we have looked at wither its Capra’s conflict of David vs. Goliath as his story shows us the conflict between Baily and Potter, Berman’s conflict between corporate America and its people or Palahniuk’sRead MoreThe Rotten Damage Of Food Waste1378 Words   |  6 Pageshere we are in 2016 where roughly one third of food produced is wasted every year. The problem with this is that about 21,000 people die per day from starvation, but where is that food they need to live? It’s rotting in the fridge, it’s being used for contests to see who can eat the fastest, or it’s simply been thrown away because the sun has gone down and people refuse to buy it the following day if it’s not new. What’s even more depressing is that most starvation deaths are of children. The firstRead MoreBottled Water And Its Effects On The Human Body1446 Words   |  6 PagesEveryday millions of people will reach for a bottle of water, not thinking about the effects it can have on many aspects of their life and others. Bottled water may seem innocent but it needs to be treated with extreme care and caution. Even though bottled water may seem safe, it could contain many toxins. By drinking from a plastic water bottle, people should consider if it is really worth the cost of paying for the actual bottle itself. People should also consider the long term effects it can have

Housing Needs Essay - 1559 Words

Housing needs When you get a new dog, you are going to need to make sure you have a few things to ensure your dog is happy, healthy and safe. A collar and a leash are important as your dog is going to need plenty of exercise. For dogs that pull on a leash, getting a harness would be a good idea. Normal healthy dogs sleep for a good part of the day so it is important that they have appropriate places to rest where they are not exposed to excessive heat, cold or weather conditions. A dog bed and a kennel are both good to have for your dog. Dogs need food and fresh water like any other living creature. A bowl or something similar for water and another for food is essential for your dog. They should be in an area where the dog has easy†¦show more content†¦This leads to weight loss, anxiety, diarrhea and other symptoms. Epilepsy is a neurological disorder that causes dogs to have sudden, uncontrolled and recurring seizures. These attacks can even cause the dog to lose consciousness. These seizures are caused by many things including trauma, exposure to toxins, brain tumors, genetic abnormalities, issues with the dog’s blood or organs. Routine health care Dogs should go to the vet every year for an annual health check up to make sure they are fine. They should also be vaccinated and receive regular treatments to diseases and parasites. Vaccinations are the only way to prevent fatal diseases for dogs. It is recommended for them to be vaccinated against parvovirus, hepatitis, distemper and canine cough where you need yearly vaccinations. Dogs should receive regular treatments to prevent fleas and worms. They can be treated for fleas, roundworms, whipworms, hookworms and tapeworms. You can stop worms by cycling your dog with regular worm treatments. Heartworms can be prevented in many ways such as daily tablets, monthly tablets and yearly injections. ACT legislation In the ACT, dog registration is compulsory and is lifelong. They must always wear their registration tag or a dog tag which must show their registration number. They must be registered if they are over 8 weeks old, have been kept in the ACT for 28 days or longer or if the owner has been a residentShow MoreRelated America Needs Affordable Housing Essay1905 Words   |  8 PagesAmerica Needs Affordable Housing It is often easy to castigate large cities or third world countries as failures in the field of affordable housing, yet the crisis, like an invisible cancer, manifests itself in many forms, plaguing both urban and suburban areas. Reformers have wrestled passionately with the issue for centuries, revealing the severity of the situation in an attempt for change, while politicians have only responded with band aid solutions. Unfortunately, the housing crisis easilyRead MoreComparison of Colleges in Political Science and Government727 Words   |  3 Pageshave. Their housing options are Co-ed housing, Apartments for single students, Special housing for international students and Wellness housing. They provide a variety of options for the students. 90 percent of freshmen live on campus first year. 37 percent of other undergraduates live in campus housing. 60 percent of people at sonoma state apply for financial aid. 70 percent of those 60 percent were offered financial aid. 27 percent o f the 60 percent offered aid had their full need met. The sportsRead MoreHow Rent Control Has Helped New York Economically And How London Currently Has Rent Inflation Essay962 Words   |  4 PagesThis essay would be an economic analysis concerning how rent control is used to ensure housing is affordable in New York. Using the market model, information and numerical statistics, this essay would prove how rent control has helped New York economically and how London currently has rent inflation. An explanation will then be given to why London needs to introduce rent control, and if London does not do that, there would be some serious consequences. An economic analysis will be given to the effectsRead MoreThe Relationship Between Poor People and Poor Places Essay1052 Words   |  5 Pagescontested one, and many different constructions have been placed on it (Spicker, 1999). The relationship between poor people and poor places is ever constant. Poverty implies for some, a lack of resources, for others, a constellation of needs (Baratz and Grigsby,1971), while for others, poverty is a social position related to the ability to participate in society (Townsend, 1979). Poor communities are typically neglected, lacking the infrastructure and servicesRead MoreDeforestation Of The Amazon Rainforest833 Words   |  4 Pagescould be higher, as accurate figures are hard to determine. C. This essay will consider three of the main causes for this destruction and deforestation of the Amazon rainforest. Firstly, the rise in housing needs and urbanization will be looked at. Following this the impact of commercial and consumer goods will be considered, before the final cause of deforestation - cattle ranching - will be debated. D. Ultimately, this essay will analyse these three main causes for the deforestation of the AmazonRead MoreHomelessness : Poverty And Lack Of Permanent And Stable Housing1244 Words   |  5 PagesHomelessness is the situation where individuals lack safe and adequate housing resulting in sleeping in the streets, their cars, and family or friends homes or in shelters. According to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), a homeless person is an individual who does not a have a permanent residence place, but rather has a temporary nighttime residence which is not designed for the accommodation of human beings (National Health Care for the Homeless Council, n.d.) SuchRead MoreAn Insight Into Their Individual Effects On A Person s Health999 Words   |  4 Pagesaccess to the best healthcare system in the world, regardless of other contributing factors, automatically translates to good health. This is not true. This essay will look into how factors such as Hou sing, Income and Employment, affect the overall quality of health and wellbeing of an individual. Using various research findings, this essay aims to explore the various determinants, and give an insight into their individual effects on a person’s health. WHAT ARE SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH SocialRead MoreThe Foreclosure Crisis1083 Words   |  5 Pagessee today. To slow or negate the continuation of this â€Å"Foreclosure Crisis† is not a simple task. The housing market is a prime example of how big business as a whole of operates. There is the need for a supplier of goods and the consumer in need of those goods thus the foundation of â€Å"Lender† and â€Å"Home Buyer†. This foundation of â€Å"Lender† and â€Å"Home Buyer† also means that turnover in the housing is a common part of the functioning financial market. Foreclosures, successfully paid off loan, readjustedRead MoreHomelessness : A Serious Social Problem1464 Words   |  6 Pagespeople are those who sleep in the open air or in provisional accommodation such as shelters or hotels, have no settlement after expulsion or release from jail or hospital, or dwell provisionally with relatives or friends on account of shortage of housing (Crane et al. 154-155). American economy has developed very fast since 1980s, but homeless population has been incr easing. They seem to be seen here and there in public place and are usually associated with poverty, insecurity, drug addiction, criminationRead MoreSomewhere For Everyone By John Grisham Essay1592 Words   |  7 Pagesmaintain adequate housing due to various reasons. According to Project Home; â€Å"Nearly one-quarter (23 percent or 127,787) of all homeless people were children, under the age of 18. Ten percent (or 52,973) were between the ages of 18 and 24, and 66 percent (or 383,948) were 25 years or older.† (2016) with many of these people experiencing homelessness for episodes of months at a time, this is a growing issue that faces Americans who are below the poverty line. John Grisham’s essay â€Å"Somewhere for Everyone†

The New Deal was not a complete success Free Essays

Due to the Wall Street Crash in 1933 the New Deal was introduced. The New Deal helped the unemployment problem but did not solve it. The New Deal stopped things from getting any worse in the short term, however in the long term only World War two solved the unemployment crisis. We will write a custom essay sample on The New Deal was not a complete success or any similar topic only for you Order Now Some historians believe that the New Deal was partly a success and partly a failure. In the opinion I think that the New Deal was a success. The New Deal had aimed to provide relief through the Federal Emergency Relief Act (FERA), this aimed to provide direct cash to the needy. $500 million has been given to states to help the starving and homeless people. The money was also used for employment schemes, nursing schools (so parents could go out during the day to find a job), soup kitchens, and blankets. The FERA was up to some point a success, for this aim many things had to be provided, if the government had stopped providing money this aim wouldn’t be a success. The New Deal planned to re-build the economy by introducing the Emergency Banking Act, which aimed to solve the financial crisis after the Wall Street Crash. Every bank was closed for a four-day ‘bank holiday’ and only honest, well-run banks with enough cash were allowed to re-open. The Securities Act forced companies giving out new shares to provide full information about the company to the public. The New Deal never solved the underlying economic problems and the US economy took longer to recover than most European countries. Confidence remained low. Throughout the 1930s Americans only spent and invested about 75% of what they had before 1929. When Roosevelt cut the New Deal budget in 1937, the country had gone back into recession. The Civil Works Administration (CWA) also helped relief. This aim provided temporary work for four million men, school, airport, roads and even 150000 public toilets. The Public Works Administration (PWA) was given funds of $3300 million. It was used to buy materials and employ millions of skilled workers to build schools, housing, hospitals, bridges, courtrooms and dams. The PWA also built ten ships and 50 airports. But this solution was only short-term. The New Deal laws clearly dealt with the problem of poverty among black people and the poorest sector. The Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) gave the government power to control the prices. They paid farmers to produce less and destroy some of the food they had already produced. They hoped that food prices would rise because there were short supplies. The idea worked-between 1933 and 1939, farmers’ incomes doubled. However, the government was heavily criticized for this idea, the government was destroying food and forcing up prices to help farmers at a time when millions in the city were starving. The New Deal did a lot to help agriculture, however did have some problem it helped large firms the most and the problems of ‘dustbowl’ continued. Projects such as the Tennessee valley authority (TVA) brought work and had improved peoples standard of living to deprived parts of the city. The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) was made to assure that all unemployed 18 to 25 year olds were given food and shelter in the countryside. They got paid 1 dollar a week they did conservation work-planted trees, dug canals, cleared footpaths and strengthened riverbanks against flooding. The Civilian Conservation Corps provided jobs for 2.5 million men. But the New Deal was blamed for giving jobs out for the sake of it, in 1941 6 million people were still left unemployed. Only when the USA entered the war the unemployment problem was solved. The New Deal aimed to create a fairer society by using the National Recovery Administration (NRA), The NRA aimed to improve working conditions in the industry and strengthened the position of labour unions against industrial giants. The Wagner act forced all employers to allow trade unions to operate in their companies. The New Deal saw women achieving prominent positions. Eleanor Roosevelt became an important campaigner. The Supreme Court thought that the New Deal did too much. They had to judge whether the New Deal was in line with the terms of the US Constitution. The judges in the court were conservative and did not like the way the New Deal allowed the government to become so involved in the economy. The judges found the National Industrial Recovery Act and the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) unlawful. Roosevelt did not want the judges to dismantle the whole New Deal. A After he was re elected in 1936 he tried to change the judges so the court was pro New Deal. This did not work, but the court realized they could not change the New Deal. In conclusion I think that The New Deal was a success as the Federal Government got involved for the first time. As well as this acts such as the WPA and the CWA provided relief for the economy. The Banking Act and the Securities Act helped solve financial problems and the AAA helped agriculture. The NRA improved working conditions in industry and women became high achievers. However there were some failures the problem of ‘dustbowl’ continued, unemployment did not go away, most New Deal laws were designed to help women rather than men and the New Deal had a lot of opposition. It was the war that finally solved the problem of unemployment. How to cite The New Deal was not a complete success, Papers The New Deal was not a complete Success Free Essays string(116) " and white unemployed people obviously wanted to support the New Deal because they would prosper from the policies\." In the subsequent pages I will explain the failures and successes of the New Deal. I will show how statistics do not show the true accomplishment of the New Deal. I will look at the criticisms Roosevelt faced and how he had come to power when America was on her last leg. We will write a custom essay sample on The New Deal was not a complete Success or any similar topic only for you Order Now When Franklin D. Roosevelt came to power in March 1933 he had America dazzled by his magnetic personality and captivating charisma. He embraced America and held it closely to his heart. He loved it and could see that Herbert Hoover’s reign over America had destroyed her. His New Deal was a fresh and exciting way of repairing the once great America. His popularity was undeniable and showed the support he was getting for the New Deal among the Americans. He gave assurance and hope to those who lived in ‘Hoovervilles’ to those who queued up for ‘Hoover Stew’. These nicknames were given to the food handouts and shanty towns to demonstrate what Hoover had done to them. Roosevelt’s aims were simple and tackled all that was wrong with America; Get the unemployed back to work, protect their savings and property, provide aid for the sick, old and unemployed, get the industry and agriculture back to it’s norm and finally restore confidence in the banks. He set up many Alphabet Agencies and passed many Acts to try and conquer the evil that was Hoover’s pandemonium. First of all I shall explain the successes. Roosevelt stopped the depression getting any worse. When he came to power in 1933 America had a much greater confidence in her economy. His own poise helped development in Wall Street. The GDP increased by sixty percent between 1933 and 1939, in six years private investment in industry increased by five times and consumer products bought increased by forty percent. People queuing up for food a was just another image of the past. Millions of people got relief, food, clothes and shelter, and it was this emergency relief that prevented them from starving. Many ordinary people were helped with government social security and welfare schemes. This wasn’t just for emergency either, it continued in the future. The most affected by the depression were farmers and Roosevelt made sure they were looked after in the New Deal. By the mid 1930s farmer’s incomes were rising, especially those with larger farms. Farmers definitely benefited. The New Deal assisted in letting farmers and home owners to stay in their homes. The HOLC was set up and low interest loans were given to home owners. This helped them to cope with mortgage repayments, that were previously out of control, when out of employment. For farmers they were given help through the Farm Credit Administration. For the old, sick and unemployed they had no security, financially or socially. In 1935 the Social Security Act set up a system of national insurance. The elderly were given old age pensions, the unemployed had benefits and the handicapped had financial support. The government, employers and workers paid contributions that funded it. The unemployed were a priority so the Federal Emergency Relief Administration (FERA) gave grants to state and local governments to stabilise the jobless. The projects the New Deal provided helped to build the foundations for future affluence. The schools, roads, dams and many more buildings rekindled America. The Public Works Administration (PWA) constructed many public buildings of the USA such as hospitals and city halls. The ‘Dustbowl’ regions were seriously affected by the depression and over-farming had led to the ruin of the land and serious lack of interest from business. But the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) restored the valley in seven states. It built several major dams to generate cheap electricity for those ninety eight percent who hadn’t got it. It also offered leisure activities on recently built lakes. The Tennessee river developed into being navigable and brought great business interest to the valley. The land was poor so the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) completed useful schemes like strengthening river banks, fighting forest fires and combating malaria by controlling the mosquitoes. Mainly to help the land though they planted approximately two hundred million trees, which significantly reduced soil erosion and supplied the crops with shelter belts. Not only did it help the environment but the members benefited. For the three million men under twenty five, who were members of the CCC, it gave them a first involvement in work. Hoover’s laissez-faire attitude had made people get used to the fact that federal government had no concern for singular states. But the TVA changed the relationship that was acknowledged by America. State and federal government now were a lot closer and in some cases federal government cut through the powers of state governments. The weaker sections of American society needed central government to get them out of despair. The homeless, old and poor were most desperate and state government couldn’t give all the help that was required. The Tennessee Valley was in such a dire condition that one state could not deal with all the difficulties that the valley was suffering with and the seven states were finding it problematic to liaise with each other. Consequently the TVA was made and did in some instances cut through the powers of the state governments. However it did help the area substantially – electricity and irrigation was provided through the building of the dams in addition to employment. Finally, and most importantly, it gave much appreciated and needed hope to America at her nadir and, in some opinions, saved American democracy. The 1930s were looking bleak at the end of the twenties but Roosevelt came in as a superhero, to save those who were despondent and long suffering. Those, once omitted by the depression and unfair politics, black people and farmers, were now involved. Why certain people supported the New deal is apparent but others are uncertain. Farmers and white unemployed people obviously wanted to support the New Deal because they would prosper from the policies. You read "The New Deal was not a complete Success" in category "Papers" They gained financial support and the economy boosted meaning that the ‘Roaring Twenties’ looked achievable once again. But what really stumps many historians is why so many black people supported Roosevelt and voted democratic (the largest number of black people to vote democratic since the American Civil war of 1861-65). Many of the New Deal agencies and acts discriminated against black people, even resulting in the NRA being commonly renamed the ‘Negro Removal Agency’ as they were pushed out when levels of wage were regulated. Roosevelt did not take actions to get black people equal rights for fear of losing his majority of voters, white southerners. However he did sign an anti-lynching bill. Directly the president showed little concern for them but on the contrary did have people who worked for him that did care and even employed some black people. Even his wife Eleanor showed her care for their welfare. Overall the New Deal mainly reduced employment from 1933 to 1937 (1933 – fifteen million unemployed, 1937 – under eight and a half million unemployed) and millions of jobs were created. Despite his critics few turned to extremism in the form of communism or fascism unlike his European counterparts. Nonetheless the New Deal did have some failures and it’s own opposition. One of the problems was not with the New Deal but in fact Roosevelt himself, in that he was paradoxicaland kept changing what he wanted to do. The laws he set were changed so quickly that the American people didn’t know where they stood. Some felt that he was dictator like and had too much control. Because of this his critics spoke out more confidently and made some reconsider their opinion of him. The Supreme Court was wholly against the New Deal and declared some acts like the PWA and AAA as unlawful. This caused parts of the New Deal to be overruled by Congress. Another problem was that big businesses still continued to be powerful and emasculated Roosevelt’s policies. Hoover’s laissez-faire attitude was appreciated by employers and because of this many begrudged the New Deal. They didn’t want government prying into business and economy and as a result larger companies hired thugs to assault union leaders and terrorize workers on strike for better working conditions and increased pay. In 1937 ten demonstrators were shot dead by police and ninety wounded during a steelworkers strike in Chicago. This discouraged employees to ask for pay and was potentially a threat to the economy. The New Deal helped the poor, sick and unemployed financially. But the very poorest were left out in the cold. The Social Security Act came to power to help monetarily but it excluded twenty percent of the workforce as well as five million farm workers and domestics in anguish. There was no source for state-paid medical care. In 1941 the poorest twenty percent were earning only four percent of the national income while the richest twenty percent were contributing forty nine percent to it. There were many poor people who could barely afford food at the price it was but when the AAA helped rise prices to increase farmer’s salaries this caused an even bigger problem for the millions of jobless Americans. Farmers with big farms profited from the New Deal but the small time farmers felt it hindered them along with farm labourers and sharecroppers, who were mainly black. These sufferers tended to live in rural America where poverty was rife, specifically southern America. An enduring drought in 1934-5 hit these already destitute states and turned the soil to dust. There was no rain and desert was spreading like wild fire. Texas, Kansas, Oklahoma and Colorado were known as ‘Dustbowl’. The ‘Okies’ set off to find work in California but instead experienced adversity. Another huge group who suffered at the hands of the New Deal were black people. There was attempts in the New Deal to tackle their civil rights but they did not go far enough. Unfortunately Roosevelt put his ego first and knew that by giving black people rights he would lose his support from the southern democratic who were deadly against giving black people equality. The emergency relief was essential for the thirty percent of black people who depended on it but there was no specific laws to combat their own distress from the depression. The 1920s were the high point of American history and industry. Everyone was confident and had no worries. Spending was high and investment was soaring. But when the crash hit everyone became disheartened. The Americans put up with Hoover’s pathetic excuse for a presidency and there seemed to be no future. When Roosevelt came there was hope again that the ‘Roaring Twenties’ would be resurrected but America was far from it. Despite Roosevelt’s best efforts by 1937 Americans were only spending and investing about seventy five percent of what they had in 1929. The most considerable and, in my opinion, the most reputation ruining encumbrance of the New Deal was that unemployment remained high for a majority of Roosevelt’s years as President. Up to 1937 the figures were decreasing from a 1933 figure of fifteen million to eight million, three hundred thousand in 1937. But because of the rising national debt of two hundred and fifty million dollars (big compared to the Hoover debt of nineteen billion dollars) Roosevelt had to cut back on government spending. This was calamitous and accordingly the economy plunged. Unemployment rose to ten and a half million as a direct result of industrial production falling by a third. By 1938 Roosevelt saw his faux pas and increased government spending in the hope to recover from this fiasco but by 1940 the 1937 level was still not met. Agencies like the CCC and PWA were labelled as forced labour because of the low pay and creating work for the sake of it. The government money funded all this so in effect by lowering the money spent by government you stopped all the jobs. Others critics said that yes America gained from the schools, hospitals and courthouses courtesy of the PWA and WPA but it was pointless work created to make Roosevelt look good. The New Deal was viciously attacked by economists who complained that the New Deal policies were short term affairs and the future of America was still dubious. They believed that those who counted on the New Deal were being conned as all the evidence clearly showed that in the near future their jobs would be gone. Also the government could reduce unemployment but could never stop it fully. They endeavoured to contain it but it was not enough. William Leuchtenburg thought that World War two got America out of the depression. Finally the last failure was that the cost was too great and a lot was wasted. For the WPA millions of dollars were spent on wages and money was given out like sweets. There was all the loans to banks, money for farmers, money to soup kitchens for necessities like blankets. All of this was seen as vital but some felt that money was being literally thrown away because Roosevelt couldn’t hope to spend the real amount needed on solving unemployment. The rich and Republicans were bitter because of the taxes increasing. They felt that government should maintain a laissez faire attitude and stop controlling their traditional freedoms. They had liked Hoover’s way of thinking. They liked his idea that people should be individually strong, help themselves and that the wealthy should be left alone to make money and not reprimanded for it. Their opinion differed greatly from the average American and so Roosevelt could not oblige everyone. These rich republicans tried to say that Roosevelt, the saviour of America, was setting up a dictatorship. Their evidence was when in 1936 he had tried to fill the Supreme Court with his loyal democrats so that his policies and ideas would not be overruled. They also said he had socialist ideas as all his policies were aimed at working class, the unemployed and the poor. My opinion is this. Franklin D. Roosevelt was a great man who defended those who were in inexplicable poverty. At some points he did change his mind but I think that he thought he didn’t need a plan b or something to resort to. When he set up the New Deal agencies and acts he thought he could appeal to America as someone who takes action. When some acts were declared unlawful I think he was shocked. After the depression everybody was like zombies, dead to their surroundings because there was no one to help. Yet here is someone who is trying to help and he is criticised and made out to be a dictator. Personally I find this shameful. Repairing the broken situation was the clear way forward. But Herbert Hoover had chosen to leave America to lick her own wounds and only took action when it was too late. Hoover had given big businesses the foot up they needed and they were more powerful that the government itself. Roosevelt cannot be blamed for larger companies’ power. Money equalled power and the wealthy were always going to come out on top. He set up all these acts and agencies and successfully saved many farmers from inevitable mountains of debt and stopped starvation for millions. There were some who were left out of this but these were the people that every society has, even today. They are the ones who are destined to fail, never seize an opportunity and lack a killer instinct. There is no desire to get out of their situation and therefore Roosevelt could not help these people. Black people did suffer and those who lived in rural areas and Roosevelt did neglect the rights of black people but he did show his support in subtle mannerisms. For instance his wife cared deeply for their wellbeing, he employed black people to work on major projects like Mary McLeod Bethune who was in charge of the National Youth Administration and he also signed an anti-lynching bill. If he was to declare his undying support for them he would be outcast himself and lose his voters. He did put his own self-importance above them but Hoover did far worse and Roosevelt had done so much good he could be forgiven for being restrained in his approach to black people. To help the rural areas he greatly increased business through the TVA and dams. His ideas were fresh and the valley took advantage of the waterways. Unemployment was the biggest issue but there is an explanation. Using the 1928 figures as a comparison Roosevelt didn’t get the figures back but after such a profitable economical peak and then an immense misfortune it would be absurd to expect him to get them back, in fact impossible. But the main issue I have is that the critics were usually the people who were not affected by the crash. The wealthy had a small dent in their bank accounts and nothing that couldn’t be fixed with some expensive wine and caviar. The Americans that really suffered valued his unexplainable care for them. He himself was from a wealthy background and could easily have just ignored the poor and get on with helping himself to profits in big companies. But something was so charismatic that it was hard to hate someone who spoke such sense, such vision and concern. Care was like a swear word to Hoover who had no regard for his country’s opinion of him. â€Å"I ask you to judge me by the enemies I have made. † Wise words from Roosevelt, and true. Wealthy economists disliked him because he cared. They wanted a laissez-faire, stone-hearted President who didn’t give a damn. But Roosevelt took a stand against the Republicans and thank God he did. Regarding the statement I agree to the extent that nothing can be perfect as things have to go back to the drawing board. But I think that considering the circumstances in which Roosevelt was handed America, he did extremely well. He completed his aims. Unemployment was it’s lowest since 1933 by 1940, with fluctuations obviously, property was saved thanks to low interest loans and savings were protected, industry and agriculture bounced back, pensions were provided for the old and benefits given to the unemployed and handicapped. Finally America was confident again. The great country America was back and the world was beckoning her to call out her glory once more. And so she did, with Roosevelt firmly behind her all the way. How to cite The New Deal was not a complete Success, Papers